TPS Meeting-October 19, 2011

This week’s paper details…

Who: Adam Omelianchuk

What: Good Atheists? A Test Case for Ethical Contextualism

When: From noon to 1pm

Where: Phil House

Why: Again, TPS is awesome

Abstract:  In this paper, I explore whether an ethical analogue of epistemic contextualism is viable. That is, how normative/evaluative terms like ‘good’ are context sensitive. Using a thick/thin distinction between differing moral visions, I defend the idea that objective morality is compatible with the deployment of context-sensitive evaluative statements. I then explore the potential weakness of ethical contextualism, specifically the implication that there are ethical standards that can be properly ignored when deploying such terms. I suggest that the solution to this problem, if there is one, begins with the fact that there are no moral saints.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s